{"id":1015,"date":"2011-08-05T01:59:09","date_gmt":"2011-08-05T06:59:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/?p=1015"},"modified":"2012-11-22T22:40:43","modified_gmt":"2012-11-23T03:40:43","slug":"active-investing-potatos-valve","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/?p=1015","title":{"rendered":"Active Investing &#8211; Potato&#8217;s Valve"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ll jump on the active vs. passive investing posting spree. To sum up for those that don&#8217;t follow a hundred other blogs, there was something negative said about passive investing, in particular that it shouldn&#8217;t be attempted in a bear\/sideways market. Well, how do we know we&#8217;re in a bear\/sideways market? Passive investing is, IMHO, still a great choice then, as making that call on market direction is too difficult for most of us to even attempt (not that that stops us). So, good counters by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.canadiancapitalist.com\/beating-up-on-couch-potatoes\/\">Canadian Capitalist<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/michaeljamesmoney.blogspot.com\/2011\/08\/working-for-negative-wage.html\">Michael James<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m a bit torn on the whole matter myself. For one thing, I&#8217;m not entirely an active or passive investor, having my portfolio split into the active half and the passive half (though the halves aren&#8217;t quite equal, with the larger half belonging to the active part). <\/p>\n<p>I completely see the logic of passive investing for the average person, and that&#8217;s all I recommend to people who ask what to do with their money. For the majority of people out there it is the right way to go: control your fees, be happy with &#8220;average&#8221; (though indeed, one can do better than the average investor with a passive approach), use your time to live your life. Or to put it another way, play to not make any errors.<\/p>\n<p>But at some level 1) I think that superior returns can be attained (e.g.: the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Superinvestors_of_Graham-and-Doddsville\">superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville<\/a>) and 2) I don&#8217;t think that I am average, helped in part by 3) the fact that my dad is an active investor who has out-performed. The average investor\/mutual fund has a short time horizon, lack of patience, chases returns, trades too much, over-values growth, under-values strong balance sheets, and is emotional. So I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a wonder that the average investor actually underperforms a passive portfolio, and moreover, I think that even a diversified passive portfolio can be improved upon. The problem of course is the Lake Wobegone effect: the average investor believes they are above average, and then makes mistakes that leads to underperformance.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s a tough line to walk there: value investors can and do underperform for long periods of time while waiting for the voting machine to turn into a weighing machine, so I want to be patient and stay the course if I have confidence in my analysis even when the market moves against me. But, I don&#8217;t want to brush away a lack of skill as a temporary underperformance. So I&#8217;ve created a set of rules for myself I call <strong>Potato&#8217;s Valve<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<p>The money flow for the passive portfolio is like a one-way valve: money only goes in (until retirement). It gets first crack at new savings to at least make the registered account contributions.<\/p>\n<p>The active portfolio started with most of my previous life savings, and can get a <em>portion <\/em>of ongoing savings as long as it&#8217;s performing. When out-performance stops (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/?p=1002\">as it did in the first half of this year<\/a>) the valve gets turned off and new savings go exclusively to the passive portfolio.<\/p>\n<p>That protects me against the hubris of continuing to think I&#8217;m above-average when the evidence says otherwise. The passive portfolio will continue to grow and will be there in the background, a cushion when I fall down, and only a tiny drag if I do make it big. Since I&#8217;m still young and very much in the savings\/accumulation phase of my investing career, my future contributions will be more than my current portfolio size, so even if I under-perform with my active portfolio (or even blow it up!) it won&#8217;t totally kill me, as long as I eventually put most of my assets into a passive portfolio that does work. Potato&#8217;s Valve should keep me investing in what has the best chance of giving me good returns in the future: my active portfolio if that continues to do well, or the passive if it doesn&#8217;t (assuming that active investing has any kind of chance &#8212; if it doesn&#8217;t, the valve will keep me from chasing that for very long with very much capital) while protecting me from myself.<\/p>\n<p>Part of this comes back to what Michael James mentioned in the comments: an active investor has to pick a benchmark and compare how well they&#8217;re doing, and have some idea of what poor performance is. It makes no sense to spend the time doing active investing just to get a poorer result than you could get with a diversified passive portfolio, and not even know it! More to the point: if you can&#8217;t track your own past investment performance, what chance do you have of projecting the performance of companies in the future?<\/p>\n<p>[Yes, this is the first time I&#8217;ve ever call that rule that, but I figure with a dumb name it might catch on]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ll jump on the active vs. passive investing posting spree. To sum up for those that don&#8217;t follow a hundred other blogs, there was something negative said about passive investing, in particular that it shouldn&#8217;t be attempted in a bear\/sideways market. Well, how do we know we&#8217;re in a bear\/sideways market? Passive investing is, IMHO, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1015"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1015"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1015\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1015"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1015"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1015"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}