{"id":1132,"date":"2012-06-30T16:45:20","date_gmt":"2012-06-30T21:45:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/?p=1132"},"modified":"2014-12-20T21:28:44","modified_gmt":"2014-12-21T02:28:44","slug":"random-thoughts-for-the-week","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/?p=1132","title":{"rendered":"Random Thoughts For The Week"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Let&#8217;s start with the nazis: grammar and food.<\/p>\n<p>For the grammar issue of the week, I bring you <em>singular they<\/em>: do you think it&#8217;s wrong to say something like &#8220;A consumer of 2012 expects their laptops to be lighter and more powerful than ever?&#8221; Or do you think the &#8220;they&#8221; referring to a single consumer is the wrong pronoun, and &#8220;him\/her&#8221; should be used instead?<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve long been fine with the singular they: tradition was to use &#8220;him&#8221; in such cases, even where the gender was indeterminate. When that became politically incorrect, &#8220;they&#8221; seemed to be an appropriate alternative: it has some parallels in the disuse of thee\/thou in favour of the singular ye\/you (which then just became &#8220;you&#8221;). Many writers started to use it, and I hear it all the time in casual speech. It&#8217;s certainly a damned sight cleaner than putting in the awkward &#8220;his\/her&#8221; or &#8220;his or her&#8221; compound everywhere. <\/p>\n<p>One alternative I don&#8217;t care for is the idea that it&#8217;s somehow more correct to use &#8220;her&#8221; in place of &#8220;him&#8221; for a gender-uncertain third person pronoun. &#8220;A student has many books to buy at university, straining her budget.&#8221; The use of &#8220;him&#8221; in that kind of sentence has been traditional and common for so long that seeing &#8220;her&#8221; in its place makes me think that the writer must somehow <em>know <\/em>the gender &#8212; it&#8217;s not serving as an effective gender-unknown pronoun. I personally find that much more distracting than the singular they.<\/p>\n<p>Like all things in life, there does need to be balance: we can&#8217;t have everyone making up their own dialect and rules, but &#8220;thou\/thee&#8221; has long since slipped from common usage to anachronistic, and we&#8217;ve had to recognize that evolution. Similarly for now, writing &#8220;u&#8221; in place of you, or using numerals for homophones &#8220;to&#8221; and &#8220;for&#8221; is a disgusting mark of poor upbringing and laziness &#8212; a hopefully temporary artifact of T9 phones that will forever be forgotten with the rise of QWERTY smartphones. But I do have to accept that one day in the distant future &#8212; long after I&#8217;m dead &#8212; such usage may be commonplace. (And for all my acceptance of linguistic evolution, I will still spin in my grave if it happens.) The role of the grammar nazi is to try to keep that sort of thing from getting a foothold in the first place, not to deny the common usage long after it&#8217;s happened.<\/p>\n<p>On to food\/grammar nazi-hybrids: if you make a dish in a non-traditional way, does it cease to be that dish? I don&#8217;t think so: language evolves, as do tastes, yet again today I heard the old saying that &#8220;chili isn&#8217;t chili if it has beans.&#8221; Well, <em>traditional Texican<\/em> chili maybe, but I think it&#8217;s more common with than without these days, and it&#8217;s not like a totally different food either way. Or like a few years ago, when a friend of Italian descent tried to tell me that there&#8217;s no such thing as &#8220;vegetarian lasagna&#8221;, because lasagna by definition has meat in it. Well, fine, think that all you want, but my vegetarian lasagna (or as I call it, &#8220;lasagna&#8221;) is pretty damned tasty, and there isn&#8217;t any confusion over what it is I&#8217;m slopping on my guests&#8217; dinner plates (or they&#8217;re able to surmount the seeming oxymoron). [Plus as an aside, my understanding is that the word refers to the noodle, not the dish.]<\/p>\n<p>I made cinnamon rolls today &#8212; kick-ass ones, I might add &#8212; and someone asked if I put raisins in them. No, as a matter of fact, I did not, nor would I <em>ever<\/em>. Raisins are gross, and I think putting raisins in your cinnamon rolls represents a serious lapse in judgement&#8230; but they do not <em>cease to be <\/em>cinnamon rolls by the addition of the raisins and their dark influence. <\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Blueberry has been getting big so quickly. I&#8217;m finding that she&#8217;s already getting heavy and tough to carry around: though to be fair I had a lot of years of training with an 8-lbs cat, so when she was ~8 lbs I was well inside my comfort zone; now she&#8217;s pushing me into the feats of strength zone. <\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s amazing how <em>fickle <\/em>she is: perfectly content to screaming banshee in a second flat. And just as often, back again. I know that movement helps to settle her, so I hold her and walk, or do a little baby rain dance. I got tired today after just a few minutes of the baby rain dance, and it made me wonder if I had missed striking the right balance in terms of when to have kids: too young, and well, you&#8217;re too young: not ready, not able to handle them. Too old, and you can&#8217;t keep up.<\/p>\n<p>Then she started crying again, and I lost that train of thought. I plodded on, doing laps of the house.<\/p>\n<p>Singing turned to pleading. Pleading to soft moaning. &#8220;Pleeaaasseee. Hushushushushshhhhh.&#8221; Then I thought perhaps this is how the zombie apocalypse would feel: zombies shuffling across the face of the earth without end, moaning while being gummed by a smaller, unhappy zombie.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Let&#8217;s start with the nazis: grammar and food. For the grammar issue of the week, I bring you singular they: do you think it&#8217;s wrong to say something like &#8220;A consumer of 2012 expects their laptops to be lighter and more powerful than ever?&#8221; Or do you think the &#8220;they&#8221; referring to a single consumer [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,4,6,5],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1132"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1132"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1132\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1132"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1132"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.holypotato.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1132"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}