Citizen’s Assembly on Electoral Reform

November 4th, 2006 by Potato

As I’m sure most of you know, we have a very simple and relatively effective form of democracy here in Canada. Paper ballots hand counted in front of eyewitnesses who can be representatives of political parties or volunteers from the public, using a first-past-the-post system with multiple ridings. Unfortunately this simplicity hasn’t always been good for selecting a government that’s made up of representatives of everyone’s point of view. I’ve had a link to Fair Vote Canada on the right there for quite some time, and now I’m going to add one to the Ontario Citizen’s Assembly on Electoral Reform.

I’m adding this because Ontario is now (along with BC) considering the possibility of reforming its electoral process, and this is a pretty exciting process that I’m going to try to follow. I’ll post updates to try to keep everyone up-to-date on what’s going on (basically, to provide the digest version along with my commentary), but for now I’ll keep it short because I’ve got a lot of background reading to do still.

Basically, the government has called on 103 random citizens (one for each of Ontario’s ridings) to form a committee to hear input from various groups and individuals, and try to decide on an alternate voting system to propose to the legislature in May. From there, we could have a referrendum next fall. One issue that’s surfaced already is that the government is proposing that the threshold to accept a change in voting systems will be set at 60% of the vote plus 60% of the ridings in favour. That’s actually quite a feat to beat, and I think I might be writing my MPP to ask her to reconsider voting on that.

Teaching Woes

November 2nd, 2006 by Potato

First off, a dig at Lost (with spoilers, for those of you who abhor that sort of thing): I’m also seriously wondering if there is an over-all story lurking in the background somewhere after all. I really thought there was, but then after setting off dynamite and imploding the hatch, with no sign of Ekko for weeks, he all of a sudden gets up, has some visions and a run in with the Cerberus(?) smoke-monster, and promptly dies. If they were writing him out of the show with practically no further contribution to the story, why not just leave him dead and buried/imploded in the hatch?

Anyhow, Halloween was really quiet. I’m told that’s because kids now trick-or-treat in the warmth of the local malls. It seems really, really wrong to me. Halloween’s usually the only time we actually go out and greet everyone in the neighbourhood…

Wait, that wasn’t what this post was going to be about. I was going to talk about teaching.

I like teaching. I think it’s an important part of the university experience: you usually get a much better understanding of your field when you have to explain it to someone who (in the case of Western students) is actively trying to misunderstand you. You also start to sympathize with the crappy job some of your other teachers have done when you see how very much effort even a mediocre attempt can take.

In my first year I had a chance to be a TA in the 1st year physics labs: perhaps the lowest of the low as far as teaching jobs go. The students there don’t really get the “point” of doing the experiments (indeed, many are “forced” to take physics in the first place), the class sizes are fairly large, most of the time in-class is spent baby-sitting, and the marking is pure hell (and usually took 14 hours on the weekend when we got paid for more like 3). Nonetheless, I liked it. I enjoyed trying to teach them decent lab techniques, and trying to cram the details of how to do the lab as well as the theory behind it into the 15 minute introductory talk.

I never got another TAship, largely because the physics department only resorted to hiring an outsider because of the massive influx of first year students after the double cohort; opportunities like that probably won’t surface again (and it was a crazy year: they were hiring new TAs right up through February, and I had burned through all my hours by March, so I didn’t need to proctor exams or anything).

This year an entirely different opportunity arose.

First, a quick bit of background info: our department has what are called “low level comprehensive exams.” Unlike the “comps” of other departments, ours are really really simple. Students are expected to write a thesis and know their own topic really well, but the department also wants them to be somewhat well-rounded, so at the end of their first year, they have a 15 minute oral exam on some topics outside their main focus. The department looks at all the topics of active research, and divvies them up into roughly 6 categories, then about 2 weeks before the exams assigns 2 categories (that are not your own) to each student. They don’t need to study too hard, just have a “Bill Nye” level of understanding of what’s going on in those areas. For years, it was a rubber-stamp administrative joke: spend a few hours studying one day and you were set. At worst, you’d be told to brush up on one area and asked to answer some harder questions by email.

Then last year, four students failed. This came as a bit of a shock, and even now nobody’s quite sure if the students heard it was a joke and didn’t prepare, or if the test got harder, or what the heck happened. So to combat this, we decided it might be best to hold an intensive ~4 hour prep seminar before the low levels. Since I’ve been looking for teaching experience, and since I’m easily the most well-rounded (scientifically), it made sense for my supervisor to pick me to run the thing and tutor the other students.

From there, it snowballed from a shortish, single-day session to a seminar series, and from there to a full-blown for-credit class that would not only serve as preparation for the low-levels, but also as a course to round out their various backgrounds so they could function in an interdisciplinary environment like ours.

Since then, it’s been an absolute nightmare. Despite the fact that teaching a class is a huge amount of work (not just lecturing, but also designing the curriculum, and creating and marking assignments), I’m not getting paid for teaching, which is pretty much a rant in its own right. There are only 3 people in the class, and I share an office with two of them, so they have absolutely no respect for me as a teacher. They fell like they were forced to take the course (and there was a certain amount of undue pressure put on them by our supervisor; though at the end of the day they were the ones who filled out their course enrollment sheet). They resent being there, and any homework they have to do (come on, it’s a for-credit master’s level course!), and constantly complain, bitch, whine, and send endless streams of emails. Some to me, some to our mutual supervisor, some to their parents, and others cast of randomly into the Ether, like wine bottles thrown from the shores of a deserted ocean atoll.

They complain about the assignments being too hard, since every last thing isn’t spelled out in class (they’re in research, they never heard of Google??). They complain about the assignments being too hard and taking too long (the longest one yet was just under 2 pages, and took me about an hour when I did it myself, and the only reason they took as long as they did is because they drastically and uncharacteristically over-thought the question, making a simple rote answer some weirdly complicated math issue), and not being at all applicable to the real world. The complaining is non-stop, and a sure sign that there is no respect there (sure, in Quantum Mechanics, we complained non-stop, but only to each other, only once, after much bravery was summoned, did we whine to the prof).

What they don’t seem to realize is that I can still fail them. (Well, not really, since my supervisor is technically the prof and I’m just an instructor, so he’s got to sign off on their marks; and he’s not about to fail his own students).

It got really bad over this past weekend as they whined and whined to our supervisor, and he actually sided with them: “The coursework shouldn’t take more than half an hour a week to do.” What the fuck? High school classes have more than half an hour a week of homework, that’s just a joke. Of course, he’s not coming from the point of view of having this actually be a real and useful course: he simply doesn’t want his research staff spending their time on coursework instead of labwork (and these kids don’t quite seem to get the “home” part of homework). Even then, the assignments I’ve given have been fairly straightforward, and shouldn’t be taking them as long as they are (is it my fault they’re slow?). The kicker is, he apparently convinced them to take the class by promising it would be that easy, yet this is the first I’d ever heard of that sort of nonsense.

Pushing her luck after that weekend victory, when I came into work I got nearly an hour of further bitching today from the more vocal part of the class. “How is this applicable?” “Seriously, this will take me 2 hours to do, and I have to prepare for a 10 minute presentation in 2 weeks, and that’s going to take me like 5 hours and I just don’t have time to deal with this now. I’m FLUSTERED!” “How is this going to help me on my low levels?” “When will I use this?”

I used that time to stare at the wall.

Towards the end, as she started with “constructive suggestions” such as devoting the last quarter or so of each class to explaining exactly how that days material would relate to the low level exam or where it might be used in real life within the next few hours, I had a very Scrubs-like moment as I drifted off. There was a very vivid vision of her sitting there in a high chair, and I was going “bbbbrrrrrrrrrmmmm, here comes the airplane!” and then she got applesauce all over her face. Poor baby, here, let me spoon feed you some more. God forbid I should cover more material in class, rather than slashing the curriculum to spend more time explaining exactly how it applies in every possible situation.

So I see now that the course is regressing from it’s “generally useful prep course” intent back to the “low level exam study session” where we started. I’ve put a lot of work into this so far, treating it like I was actually some kind of university instructor lecturing in a for-credit class. Each 2 hour class takes 10+ hours of prep time (and that’s assuming I only come in with a detailed lecture plan + slides, and didn’t take the extra few hours to actually practice my talk verbatim). But if they only have to put in ~30 minutes per week for credit, why should I do any more for free? Great opportunity to flesh out my CV or not, my supervisor essentially dumped this in my lap because he doesn’t care enough to bother trying to teach it himself (and I’ve taken his classes before: they involved a lot of catch-up readings that took way more than a few hours a week — less work for the students usually means more for the teachers, unless less is being learned), so if he’s not even going to stand behind my/our curriculum and teaching strategy, I don’t really see the point of trying so hard anymore.

As for the moritorium on homework, there’s really only one way around that: pop quizzes and/or tests. I think pop quizzes are the way to go, since tests usually require studying which eats even more time than just doing an equivalent assignment in the first place. So my Evil Plan ™ for tomorrow, the half-way class, is to spring a pop quiz on them at the end. Really, it’s the only way to ensure that they spend a half hour on the work. If I let them do the same assignment after class, they could very well zone out, fall half asleep, and spend half an hour just reading the questions.

Wayfare made a very good point before I could really get into my Evil Laugh: these kids are not the brightest bulbs in the bunch, and will likely complain about a pop quiz even more. To try to circumvent this, I’ve taken actual high school problems and made them easier. True, they’re technically OAC-level problems, so current high school standards might be just a bit lower, but everyone in this class is (barely) old enough to have gone through OAC.

What Eats Wasps: Review

October 31st, 2006 by Potato

For my birthday, Wayfare picked up a copy of “What Eats Wasps?”, a book by New Scientist magazine basically containing a selection of their last page reader question/answer articles. It was a pretty good choice: I like books full of weird and vaguely useful facts, and wasps are scary so it’s well suited for just before Halloween.

From New Scientist’s point of view, this had to be an incredibly easy book to put together: take a bunch of articles that are already written, and combine them into a book to sell again. However, they didn’t seem to do a very good job with that. Part of the problem seems to stem from the fact that the articles were originally published with metric units, and for the book these were converted to units that would be “more familiar to Americans.” It’s mistakes like these that keep costing us Mars probes. The unit conversions seem to have been completely screwy, because I can’t make sense of most of the examples given: one talks about how big a person would have to be in order to have enough fat around their internal organs to stop a bullet before it hit anything vital. “For a man 16 [sic] feet tall…”. About 2/3s of the way through the book, they seem to have given up, and left everything in metric.

It was a bit of an interesting read, but I don’t think I’d recommend it to anyone. Maybe if you can find it in the library and just want to flip through, or if you can just read the articles right out of the magazine…

TreeHouse of Horror

October 31st, 2006 by Potato

I really don’t understand what the heck has been up with the Simpsons’ Halloween episodes the last few years. I really expected there to be an episode this sunday (Halloween sunday), especially since the season already started over a month ago (with no notice, no fanfare, and a big stretch of reruns since the first 3 new episodes). November?! Foolish humans, we already have our Christmas decorations up by then!

Anyhow, I found it online, so all is right with the world again.

Crazy Day at the Hospital

October 30th, 2006 by Potato

All the crazy people are making a break for it today. We’ve had a code red (fire), two code whites (violent person) and two code yellows (missing patient).

Our Halloween party this year was pretty lame. Wayfare, formerly renouned for throwing THE Halloween party to addend, had hardly anyone respond to her invitation. Of those who did come, none really dressed up, and no one wanted to go out as per the original plan (not even to Rol San, which is extremely surprising for Joce). There was lots of junk food, though, and Shaun of the Dead, so it wasn’t a complete write-off.

Worst of all, though, is that we ended the party so early that we never got around to getting our extra hour, which was half the fun of having a Halloween Saturday party night!

The next day, Wayfare & I had completely forgotten about the time shift, and hadn’t changed any clocks (oddly enough, my laptop didn’t give me that “your time has been changed…” popup). We wanted to see Nightmare Before Christmas in 3-D, so we rushed out to the theatre, and it was only when we were in the car that the radio reminded us about the whole daylight savings thing. That gave us some time to hit the Shoppers Drug Mart for some discounted candy and more Halloween decorations (I believe we are now up to 11 file boxes full of Halloween decorations. Our apartment is fairly thickly decorated, and we’ve only touched 4 of the boxes; none of them was completely emptied).

Anyhow, so eventually we get to the theatre in the middle of nowhere to see NBC3-D. And I’d like to say that it was really, really dumb of the theatres to not release this cult Halloween classic on any screen in the downtown area on Halloween weekend. Even way up in Woodbridge the theatre was packed for a Sunday matinee: how much business could they have got from the pre/post Halloween Saturday club crowd if they showed it at Paramount? But nnoooooo, Paramount was showing Open Range in 3-D instead. I wonder if anyone bothered to go…

Back to the point, the theatre was fairly full. Wayfare & I sat near the back and watched the show. There were two empty seats beside us, but garbage had been left there from the last show, so no one wanted to sit there while the lights were up. 40 minutes late (just about the halfway point for NBC), two people show up and plop down beside us with a tonne of food. They had nachos, burger king, popcorn, and a strong smell of beer (though I couldn’t say for sure whether they were just unshowered from the night before, or had snuck beer into a matinee). They talked through the whole movie, and made a giant mess of their seats when they left, right down to spilled nacho cheese. It was just astoundingly rude, and I was really close to actually telling them off, except the kids behind us were kicking their seats with reckless abandon, which was pretty entertaining (until they started kicking mine, too).

A day later though, and I’m still left wondering: why show up to a 2:30 movie at 3:10? Why not just wait until 4:45 and actually see both halves of your $13 movie? And if you walk into a theatre that full, that late, and with that much food, why not bite the bullet and plop down in the neckbreakers up front rather than running up and down the stairs for an aisle seat, or pushing past people who are trying to enjoy the movie?

As for the movie itself: I don’t think the 3-D aspect added anything to it. It was already claymation which does tend to “look” 3-D even on flat screens (at least, a bit more than much cel animation), and those 3-D glasses are a little nauseating when worn overtop of my regular glasses. However, it was nice to see it up on the big screen for Halloween weekend, and I’m rather surprised that sort of thing doesn’t happen more often. Rocky Horror gets shown every year like clockwork, but fall is usually a somewhat slow time for the theatres (usually they see the desperate, re-edited/re-shot dregs that couldn’t quite manage a summer release), so I think they might actually do better putting some classic Halloween movies like this (and other horrors) up on one or two screens of the multiplexes… and in areas that are actually close to the demographics that enjoy that sort of thing (i.e.: not woodbridge).